Liz Gilbert is pushed all the way to the judgment by a culture that says too much

The backlash is not about a book it is about the way we erase trauma voices

It’s September 4th, 2025. The damn book isn’t out until September 9th. Nobody has read it. Not you, not me, not the peanut gallery on Substack already clutching pearls and sharpening hot takes. Maybe a couple of journalists got early copies—fine. The rest? They’re winging it. And still the judgments fly like gaudy confetti at a wedding everyone regrets attending. My feed’s jammed with declarations of what the book is, what it isn’t, why it’s indulgent, why it’s a mess.

And I’m furious. Not with the book. I haven’t read it. Not many people have. My fury is for the spectacle—this reflex to chop down a story before it can take its first breath. Years of work poured into something, and before the ink is dry, it’s shredded by people reacting to shadows of their own making. Like sitting in a courtroom with no jury, no evidence, no testimony—just a verdict. Guilty. Done.

And this isn’t about Elizabeth Gilbert. That’s the point. It’s not new. That’s the sick part. Same cycle, same labels. When something shows up raw, messy, alive, people panic. They slap on their favorite stickers: wrong, indulgent, problematic, too much. It’s lazy. It’s cowardly. It’s exhausting to watch the same charade play out again in real time.

I’ve seen this circus before. Glennon Doyle got it. Liz Gilbert is getting it. Taylor Swift gets it. The Epstein survivors get it. And me? I’ve felt it in my skin. The chorus doesn’t change: too messy, too self-indulgent, too much. Always too much.

I’ll never forget that intake session with a therapist. I was looking for EMDR. I gave her the short version of my story—fifteen minutes, no frills, just the bones. When I stopped, she said: maybe leave out eighty percent next time. It’s a lot to take in.

That wasn’t advice. That was erasure. What she meant was: your story overwhelms me, so shrink it, sanitize it, make it easier on me. She didn’t want my truth; she wanted a digestible sound bite. My life reduced to a polite appetizer.

And this is the same reflex I see everywhere. This isn’t about Liz. This isn’t about Glennon. This isn’t about Taylor. This isn’t about the Epstein files. Those are just anchors.

The abyss is cultural.

Survivors of Epstein stand in front of cameras, speak their abyss aloud, and the response? Hoax. Files sealed tight, establishment hands gripping the lid. Because if we all looked in, we’d have to face the bottomless pit of what humans do to each other. The abyss is unbearable. So people deny, dismiss, shove it away. Easier to call it fake than to let the rawness crack their armor.

The moral high ground is just a stage. People climb up there to deliver pronouncements, robes billowing, and really it’s just cover. A safe distance. A clean vantage point far from the mud they don’t dare touch.

Listen to the words people choose when they reject a story. They’re not about the story at all. They’re a mirror held up to their own limits.

Call queer love friendship and you’ve confessed you can’t handle intimacy outside your comfort script. Call addiction exaggeration and you’ve dodged your own reflection in the glowing screen on your lap. Call trauma testimony indecent and you’ve admitted your comfort is worth more than someone else’s truth.

The discomfort doesn’t live in the story. It lives in the reader. The story just drags it into the open. And instead of facing it, the reader throws it back at the teller: you’re too much.

What they really want is neatness. Heroes and villains. Arcs and lessons. Bows tied at the end. A book they can close and walk away from, intact. Raw memoir doesn’t do that. It hands you the mess as it is: the grief, the desire, the silence, the collapse. No polish. No bow. Just: this is what it was like. That’s what makes people recoil. They’re not condemning the story; they’re condemning how the story makes them feel.

This isn’t a detached observation. It’s carved into me.

I’ve spoken my truth and felt the step back, the subject change, the silence stretching across a table. I’ve watched eyes glaze, felt the air turn heavy, known in my bones I’ve been filed away as too much. That dismissal doesn’t fade. It’s erasure all over again. Like someone lifting a book in front of their face because they don’t want to see you.

So when I watch Liz’s book dismissed before it even lands, I feel it in my body. It’s my own story shoved aside. My own silence replaying. This is bigger than one writer, bigger than one book. It’s a culture allergic to truth unless it comes neatly folded. Everything else gets labeled excessive and pushed away. And the people telling those stories get told they are excessive. We’re trained to believe the only acceptable truth is the one that fits the tidy box.

Let’s strip it bare. Not about Liz. Not about Glennon. Not about Taylor. Not about Epstein. Anchors. Just anchors. The abyss is cultural. Calling something “too much” isn’t critique. It’s discrimination. Bias dressed as taste. It’s the cultural way of saying: I’ll only listen if your story doesn’t disturb me.

And who sets the rules of taste? The ones with privilege, with power, with the luxury of never having their stories called indecent. They draw the line for “respectable,” and respectability becomes the leash. Respectability is the velvet rope at the club of acceptable pain. If your grief doesn’t dress right, it doesn’t get in. It tells women their feelings are overblown. It tells queer people their love is marginalia. It tells survivors their testimony is better swallowed whole in private.

Raw trauma memoirs aren’t self-help manuals. They don’t hand you bullet points and happy endings. They’re not roadmaps. They’re survival artifacts. They exist because someone had to get it out or be swallowed by it. Raw memoir says: I’m still here. This happened. It’s witness. Testimony. One person standing in their wreckage saying, look, this is what it felt like to be me. And in that act, solidarity is born. Another voice whispers back: me too. I’m not alone in this mess.

Raw memoir doesn’t wear polish. It shows up with the cracks visible, the grief leaking, the chaos intact. It doesn’t fix or clean or resolve. It stands naked in its imperfection and says: be here with me anyway. And that invitation is radical.

Because in a world that worships polish, raw honesty is rebellion. And rebellion is what we need. We need mirrors that unsettle. Stories that make us sweat, that won’t let us hide in our old ideas. We need the heartbreakers, the ones that tear the neat frame apart. Those are the stories that show us truths we can’t get anywhere else.

Rawness costs. It costs the writer everything: to stand exposed, to risk the eye-rolls, the dismissals, the labels. And it costs the reader too. Their comfort, their illusions, their neat worldview. Rawness drags them out of the easy way and asks them to stay in the hard place.

So here’s the real question: are we ready to hold that? Are we willing to pay the cost of listening? Are we willing to sit in front of the mirror and not look away?

I have been silent long enough. I’m ready for the conversation now. It’s time for us to be seen, to be heard—not pitied for it. Pity is erasure. We don’t need pity. We need you to stay in the room.

What matters is this: when rawness walks into the room, do we listen?

We don’t. We shut it down.

Thank you for walking this path with me.

Read the follow up that show you the Success Side of this story. Out now.

Liz and Glennon rise in the fullness of their stories

Would you be willing to support my work by subscribing or contributing? It would mean so much to me.

Your presence here means the world. Creating art, testing recipes, and sharing these reflections is a labor of love, a way to connect, a lifeline. But, as you know, love doesn't pay the rent, or replace a car.

Since January 2024, my mental health has forced me onto sick leave, leaving Monty and me with a mere €300 a month. And, as I shared in 'When Healing Means Losing Everything,' the reality is, this isn't sustainable.

When Healing Means Losing Everything

By the end of 2025, I am losing my home, an need to leave a country that no longer feels like home. I'm will and need to be building a new life, a new beginning, and your support could be the bridge.

If my words have touched you, if you believe in creating spaces of honest reflection, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your contribution directly fuels this work, allows me to keep sharing, and helps me build a future.

I know times are tight. If a monthly subscription isn't feasible, a one-time tip, even the price of a coffee or a bag of cat food for Monty, makes a difference. You can contribute here.

And a big Thank You to every single one of you having contributed to this short boust of impermanent fame….